Monday, 23 March 2015

Ben- Evaluation Question 7

For Our Preliminary, we had the idea of doing a Thriller piece as this would give us some extra practice in this Genre. This (I feel) is apparent as the Thriller piece is seemingly more refined than the Preliminary, both in the Story, equipment used and Technical Codes.

Camera Work:

Framing

 Beginning with Camera work, what I like from the preliminary is the Action Cuts or Blur Cuts. I am unsure of any name this transition might have but the way it works is it starts with one shot, planned to have a fast Pan or Tilt at the end. We found it difficult to stop the camera exactly were we wanted it from the previous subject. Therefore we split the shots in two takes, and made sure there was a blur at the end of the first take and the beginning of the second. Cutting these two blurs together made it nearly seamless and as if it was all one take. We had little need for such a transition, but we had several shots we planned to increase Enigma and Suspense. Where as in the Prelim we stuck largely to Medium Shots. In the Thriller we had Extreme Close Ups, Big Close Ups, Close Ups, Medium Close Ups, Medium Shots, Medium Long Shots, Long Shots, Extreme Long Shots and Over The Shoulders.
Medium Shot, Preliminary
Action Cut Begins, Preliminary
Extreme Close Up, Thriller

Over The Shoulder, Thriller

Techniques

 However we replaced the hidden Action Cut with more apparent shots such as a few Point Of View shots, a slow Zoom out and turn, a Graphic Match, a Pan around and the last shot in the film that is only a Zoom In. Adding this wide variety of shots worked in our favor by keeping pace in the film steady but also by adding variety to the shots so they're not all static at Eye Level. Not all these interesting shots worked as intended, be it to inexperience while editing, or problems with the footage. The three that I believe worked the least are the Pan around, the Graphic Match and the Slow Zoom Out. The Pan was an idea at the start of Pre-Production that was something we wanted to try. Originally intended to be done using a Steadicam, we had to make do without. This ended up Handheld and very shaky. The Graphic match was simpler as it only needed the actor and camera operator to do the same shot in two locations. Despite for one shot being out of focus, framing for both worked. However, not enough of the background is showed in both shots. The point was to bring the film back from the forest to the graveyard however it only appears like a jarring Jump Cut. This is how we aimed it to be [Link]. The Background, Costume, Lighting and Sound all serve to make this less jarring. The last shot is the Slow Zoom Out and Turn. Originally it was a solo idea that got put in, it starts in a Close Up on the actor lying down acting dead, with the camera orientated vertically, parallel to the eyes. A slow Zoom Out begins and at the same time, the camera operator turns the camera to be level. When the movement stops the actor gasps as to give a surviving breath. Several things went wrong. The movement was rough and thrashed about several times, the actor was smiling and did not appear particularly dead, and the sound was interrupted by birds. All in all the Preliminary's shots worked very well but were far simpler. In the Thriller we did not succeed in all the shots, but experimented with a wider, more difficult variety.
Panoramic movement, Thriller
Out of Focus Graphic Match, Thriller
Slow Zoom Out and Turn, Thriller

Angles & Movement

 The angles used suffered in the Thriller. Where in the Prelim there is a Very Low Angle to show the superiority of an angry character, the most there was a High Angle, during the Pan shot. There are more angles throughout the Thriller, however they are only slight High and Low. This may be because we were focused on the framing, or we forgot to implement it, but if angles were there, they would most likely assist several weak or long shots. However it is the opposite on camera movements. The Prelim has one Tilt and two Pans, while the Thriller has one Pan and two Handheld Tracking shots from the different angles. The Tracking shots are Handheld because the ground at the scene was muddy and covered in leaves, making a dolly impractical. But these shots worked well nonetheless with the camera shake that followed the walking. Walking which I believe may not be apparent, be it not for the camera shake.
Low Angle, Preliminary
High Angle, Thriller
Slight Low Angle,  Thriller
ECU Handheld Track, Thriller

Overview

 What improved camera wise on the Thriller from Preliminary is the shot framing, with several different shots taken that could break up the scene and make it more manageable for viewers. Angles saw no improvement, while the Movements saw improvement, but it was only present for two shots. Focus was improved by leagues, where many shots in the Preliminary were out of focus, only one in the Thriller was. This is still something that needs working on however. White Balance was similar to the Prelim as it had no jarring orange colours excluding for a few seconds on the last shot where the White Balance was thrown off as the light in the room turned on.
White Balance Hiccup, Thriller
White Balance Stabilises, Thriller

Mise en Scene

Lighting

 The Lighting, and consequentially the video quality, was improved drastically from the Preliminary. In the Prelim, we had one umbrella light with a stand that was plugged into the wall and placed in the corner of the room. We wanted dark, minimal lighting to make the entire scene spooky and mysterious. It did not work. We did not think very hard on where to put it, in the corner by a power plug was good enough. This meant only one actor was properly lit, but the light still created strong shadows through the scene which looked unnatural and odd. The uneven, low lighting also meant the camera struggled as on the unlit actor, the ISO (The camera's light sensitivity) is on a high setting. This creates an ugly and grainy effect on the film that is somewhat distracting. The only times we moved the light was when it was going to appear in the shot, but we still did not place it anywhere better. In the Thriller however, things changed. After lessons and research on the subject, we all learned of the Three Point Lighting system that can be used to create both Low and High Key lighting. Unfortunately we were only able to acquire one light but it did not matter as much since our filming time presented large amounts natural light for us. The light we did get, a handheld, LED light came with diffusers that even out the light so as not to create the strong shadows seen in the Prelim. We had two kinds: one that clipped onto the light and came different colours, and a large fold out circle that worked considerably better despite being so cumbersome. This all provided soft lighting for when we needed it, and for one occasion where the harder light is what we wanted to create higher contrast in the image.
Strong Shadows but Grey Colours, Preliminary
Light and Diffuser to the Left, Thriller
Hard Light from Below, Thriller

Costumes

Where in the Preliminary we chose one actor for convenience of what he wears daily, in the Thriller we had specific instructions for costumes. The main character, Geoff, is a detective so we thought of a smart, respectable and cool outfit consisting of primarily of a shirt and tie with a long coat. As I was playing the character, I went through several wardrobes, adding what added to the look of cool detective. Because the shirt seemed too bright and contrasting against the black coat. The jeans, despite not being seen at all times show someone who is hardworking but also bring some colour. The dark colours also connote darkness, evil and death. The Assailant is the Third character that is never fully revealed. Because of that, the costume instructions were black long coat and everything else, black. This costume turned out to be near enough perfect. We had instructed for a black hat too but the addition of the scarf by the actor put everything together. The black colours were made to again connote darkness, evil and death, but also fear. This needed to be doubly so since this character is the Antagonist that attacks what is seemingly an innocent bystander. The second character shown, Susan, wears a light jogging outfit, The idea being she was on jog when she was attacked. We gave instructions to our actress to be as colourful as possible, unfortunately the best she had was a pink top. However her grey jacket and black leggings tied her costume in with the other two. Instead, with the Prelim costumes however, the first character was a long shot at stereotypical clothing while the second character was wearing that the entire day. The first character, again played by me was meant to be a henchman of sorts, therefore I attempted to hit a few stereotypes on 'chav' clothing. This was because when I thought of criminal organisations with henchmen disappointing the boss, images of young people with snapback hats came into mind. This is why I went with a sideways snapback hat, a buttoned up grey polo shirt and a hoodie with the laces together. 
Detective Geoff, Thriller
Assailant, Thriller
"Hip" Character 1, Preliminary
Running Susan, Thriller

Setting

The Preliminary had one location. A classroom within college with the door in the corner we needed. The one Setting meant filming was completed very quickly. However, the room was cluttered with computers, chairs tables and posters that made the background distracting. While in the Thriller we had three separate locations. The main two, The All Saints Church graveyard and Eastern Road Nature Reserve, were in wide open areas. The backgrounds consisted of trees and/or churches that, for the most part, was a constant distance away from the camera. The last setting is again in college. A small cubicle room with a light and switch inside at the edge of campus. The windows were blacked out with card to make sure that the only light source was from the light in the room. This room was used for the last shot in the film to round everything off.
Classroom location, Preliminary
Graveyard Location, Thriller
Forest Location, Thriller
Enclosed Room Location, Thriller

Sound

Soundtrack

The Preliminary as a very simple order in its soundtrack. A beginning, suspenseful track to set the mood. A middle track to shock the audience on the plot twist/big reveal. And the final track to sustain the fast pace through to the end. This is done in three separate tracks cut into them at different points to use them to the max. The second track for example, Unlight, is only heard for a few shots, a few seconds into the track, but it helps to punch up the gears and increase the pace quickly. What did not go so well are the transitions between tracks. There is one, obviously apparent second that is a silent gap between two tracks, while the other transition is rushed, sudden and also pops on the transition. The reason it pops is because the music files are .mp4. This has a different rate from all the other .Mov files and therefore pops. This was fixed in the Thriller by converting the .mp4s to .Wav files. Many things were improved in the Thriller. The transitions, the music and the use of music. The transitions were improved by following each track along with the action and also the upcoming track. For example, the first track Diminuendos on one last piano note, while the next track, Crescendos on piano and a low, bass hum that builds suspense. The piano makes it seem to be the same track. The next track is the plot twist/big reveal piece that is not exactly what was wanted. The reason this track (Ghostapocalypse by Kevin MacLeod) is not the best for this film is because the tempo is much faster than the other soundtracks. The reason it was used however was because of the build up and the drop at the end worked to introduce the sudden increase in action and then ease it out. It was just the very heavy percussions that off set everything and catches anyone watching off-guard. If we had more time, perhaps a new track with a build up and drop could have been found to replace the drums to keep the Pace more controlled. For the crime scene Scene, it was difficult to find something to fill that nearly minute long gap without taking away from it. One track had a looping, ringing noise that when inserted into the sequence it created an uncomfortable feeling. It makes it apparent that something is wrong as if by replicating ringing ears. The fifth and final track in the Thriller is there to finish everything off by saying "This is the situation, stay tuned"

Foley & Recording

In the Preliminary, our only sound recording was from the camera's onboard microphone. The problem with this is that as the camera moves around, whatever ambient sound the camera was recording originally, can change dramatically in volume. This was not a huge problem in the Preliminary as the small, enclosed location was relatively quiet. Some Dialogue was still shoddy however. To negate this problem, ambiance is recorded separate from the camera. This recorded ambiance, from all the locations, was then put appropriately into the sequence, removing any distracting sound level changes. A lot more than just ambiance was recorded. With a sound recorder we recorded dialogue, footsteps, post-filming dialogue and Foleys. There was a small use of Foleys in the Preliminary (Bird squawks) but the Thriller saw much more use. The ending was recorded using hand slapping. The scratch was done by running nails against carpet, however this is covered by the afore mentioned percussions. A few lines of dialogue was also recorded after filming. The recordings come out much cleaner than they would have from the camera. One problem that arose was that some audio files had gone missing. Whether they were not recorded or not transferred is unknown, but this made it necessary for some shots to use camera audio. Whether the microphones are recording or not is certainly something to look for in future.
Bird noises, Preliminary
Foley punching, Thriller

Editing

Transitions

Transitions remained for the large part, simple. The Thriller begins with a fade in from black but the largest majority of Transitions are Cuts with a few Cut to black. This is the same with the Preliminary, although instead of implementing Cut to blacks within the sequence to move along, it was used to end the Prelim. Other than this, we had a match on action in the Preliminary which we did not do on the Thriller. Instead there is a Graphic Match and a last minute transition out of a black screen. Clothes of the character obscure the lens. When he walks away the camera is exposed. It worked rather well but what would have improved it was locking the aperture and ISO settings to avoid the initial overexposure.
Overexposure in glaring white, Thriller

Title

The Thriller title sequence required to be ominous as to complement the film and the name 'Absence'. However there are technical skill limitations on our part. We cannot create a CGI clown to piece the title together like a jigsaw puzzle, not that a clown would make sense. Instead we were able to find a moving fog effect on a green screen that we were able to implement into the sequence. The we decided on the text moving in from the behind the camera and moving further and further away. An improvement from no title in the Preliminary, it could still be improved itself. For example, more appropriate colours (e.g. red) and and more themed or stylized font. The fog saved it from being an uninteresting black screen.
Text and fog, Thriller

Ben- Evaluation Question 6

In the Thriller intro we used considerably more equipment than in our Preliminary task. But we also used it better and more efficiently.


Camera

We used my personal Canon 1100D DSLR camera for filming as I know how to use it far better than any other cameras provided. It provides a higher quality video with 12.2 megapixels and my two lens - an 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 and a 36-78mm f/3.5-5.6 - provide a wide range of possibilities. We used a tripod for many shots to stabilise the camera. The only other option was handheld which proves to be too shaky for many shots. What would have improved the film as a whole is switching the camera to a fully manual mode. That is where the exposure, Frame per Second, Aperture and ISO must all be set manually to suit the location and scene. The automatic setting can also be slow in change, meaning something like moving outside into bright sunlight results in several seconds of overexposed footage. Manual settings don't change, therefore can be preset or changed quickly for a specific location. My camera also comes equipped with an on-board microphone that syncs directly to the footage. However we opted to use a separate, higher quality sound recorder in which we could choose whether to have surround sound or narrow focus recording.



Correctly exposed - all detail and colour shown
Over exposed - detail and colour lost

Lighting

The Three point Lighting system is a standard lighting set up that can be used to create several different lighting styles from natural light to dark and mysterious. This requires three lights to control illumination, shadows and background separation (Key, Fill and Back light). Unfortunately we were only able to procure one light, severely limiting what we could do. Thankfully there was a large amount of natural light available at the time of filming, meaning it was of little matter whether we used no lights or twenty. The light we should have sued more of is the Back light. Placed behind the subject, it separates him/her/it from the background. A few shots appear dull as colours seemingly blend into each other. A diffuser was used to soften the harsh LED lights. Despite it not being a piece of technology, without this piece of equipment, the subject would have been too brightly lit. The camera may also register this increased brightness and adjust, underexposing the image. To improve for next time, using at least two lights, one Key and one Back, to make the wanted effect in the image is achieved.

Three Point Lighting

Editing

To edit, we used Final Cut Pro. A software we were already familiar with from the Preliminary, we all knew how to use the basics. What we tried to do for the Thriller is go beyond that. Editing was very much a 'Do everything as well as possible and keep going back to improve' sort of process. A large amount of the focus was on Sound as it was of poor quality in the Preliminary. This unfortunately left the video largely neglected for once the shots were organised, focus was immediately on Dialogue, Soundtrack, Ambiance and Foleys. The story included several flashback scenes that needed the jump in time to be explained visually.


"A standard technique is to begin the flashback scene(s) with a flash of white and colour correct the video (e.g. Black & White or High Saturation). However a flash would add time that would impede with what is supposed to initially be a fast transition into the flashback. To substitute, a dull white vignette was added to the first flash back sequence. While to separate the second flashback sequence, Saturation was turned down 90%."

"The Soundtrack was accidentally all made by Kevin MacLeod. His wide variety of music had fulfilled all our needs. Not every track was used in full. 'Deep Haze' only has a two second clip in use, but it was looped several times to create a near constant ringing noise for the Crime Scene Flashback. The last track, 'Supernatural' is a synth accompanying a choir. This track brings the pace down for the ending but also complements the last shot by creating unease in the audience."



Ben- Evaluation Question 5

  People go with what is familiar and trending. For example, "Interstellar" is directed by Christopher Nolan, who has also directed the highly popular "Dark Knight Trilogy" and "Inception". A known figure, say, Chris Pratt, would bring people that are turned off at the idea of using over an hour watching something they might not enjoy. But Chris Pratt would convince them otherwise.
  Chris Pratt on a student film would already make enough headlines that there would be no need to advertise for any audience. Everyone would watch the film just for Chris Pratt. But without that giant hunk of Star-lord/Jurassic Park sex appeal, we had to resort to local friends as the cast.


In Question 4 - Who would be the audience for your media product? 

I answered my target audience would be Men and Women aged 16-30.



  People want a certain reaction when going to movie, be it scared, entertained, romantic etc. With a Crime-Thriller, people would want to feel the Suspense, the Action, the Shock and the Purpose!
 The Purpose comes Geoff's love for Susan. The force that pushes him to seek justice and maybe a little revenge. But first, this needs to be explained to the audience and Susan's grave is the perfect place to do it. Sadness on his face with doubly sad and retrospective music say right away in the first few shots that Todorov's Equilibrium has already broken. This would develop empathy for Geoff making him more than a bad actor.
Sadness becomes more apparent with dialogue
"I'm sorry"
Sadness escalates onto knees

  Of course no point in showing someone sobbing at a graveyard when you can show the reason for their sadness with movie magic. The flashback sequences showing Susan keep cutting into the present, as if Geoff is remembering a bad memory. The camera has two small shots of feet running along the ground and blurred runner in medium shot can get the ball rolling on that something is wrong. Since that is all that is needed, these two scenes end 49 seconds in. Out of the 2 minutes 36 seconds, it's not much. This is because no one wants to be stuck in one place for too long. Take the monster fighting movie "Pacific Rim" as an example that had intermittent introduction voice over for the first 20 minutes. Keeping at the right pace without dragging on keeps the audience interested and not sunk at the back of their seats.
  These two scenes end with the fight between Susan and the Assailant. The music changes from eerie X-Files like piano to a gradual build up into fast paced Drums party, for lack of a better word. The reason for change is because as the action increases, so does anticipation in the audience. The right soundtrack builds on this and the better the music, the worse the more ways the audiences is thinking of how it could go down. Keeping with the previous music would make contrapuntal and while this can help to unsettle the audience (Nursery rhymes in Horror movies), it is too early in the film to unsettle and scare away the audience. The build up, a breathing like sound that crescendos, eases the transition from X-Files into Drums party. Without it, it would come as a shock and most of the audience would be too busy finding their nerves to notice what is happening. What more, it just doesn't sound good. The Drums party also has a build down at its end. A sort of metal clang that slowly diminuendos. Where the build up eased the transition in, the build down eases the transition out. This makes another change in pace facilitated by the three seconds of only diegetic sounds. No soundtrack.
  This scene acts as a sort of taster to the action that would be coming in the film. Also shows half of the primary dilemma, she has been kidnapped, but everyone thinks she's dead. The case would be closed without enough evidence to bring up any suspects and everyone would be none the wiser. Teeming with suspense. 
Running feet introducing flashback
Everything necessary shown in 49 seconds


Cinema Sins agree: http://goo.gl/aGfXjp
Build up begins
Climax of the action, 'Drum Party' attacks
Build down begins




  The next scene is the flashback in which we see Geoff find out about Susan and react as many would, discovering the sudden loss of a loved one. However, the audience already knows what happened (Unrestricted narration). Making them feel at least a fraction of what Geoff is feeling will make them connect and empathise with him, all together, build his character to someone they can care about. If they don't care about the protagonist the plot becomes a big jumble of uninteresting nothing. Extreme Close Up shots create unease and discomfort as that much detail on a specific area or body part is unnatural from our standard point of view. To further this discomfort, a continuous ringing noise is playing through this entire scene. This acts a bit like white noise, distracting the audience somewhat simulating someone trying to block a surfacing memory.
Extreme Close Ups are too much detail, too big
Fallen over in grief. High angle for weakness
  The large lack of dialogue, I feel, makes the audience focus more the subjects so they can work out what is happening instead being told in several dialogue cliches that these two went to college together. They pay more attention to the character's facial and body expressions to see how they are feeling. Are they standing tall and confident or slouching and uninterested? Is there a big smile on their face or a solemn look of pure terror? The audience is not in the middle of the action to smell the fear on people. The next best thing is feeling, feeling yourself in the action. That lump in your throat as your favourite character holds their dead friend in his/her arms. Character development is important to involve the audience, and this holds true on any character. Whether it is what I call a narrator character, where the audience views the plot through his/her eyes e.g. John Watson in Sherlock. Or, what I call a hero/heroine character that goes through several challenges as the audiences watches from outside e.g. James T. Kirk in Star Trek: Into Darkness. From the intro, Absence is the latter of these two. The former (Narrator character) is enjoyable because both the audience and the character are on equal footing through Restricted Narration. As the character learns (or just as they're about to) the character learns. This is key to Crime-Thrillers as withholding information and upholding Enigma makes the audience want to figure out the crime themselves. A stimulating and thrilling puzzle which many in the target demographic enjoy completing. The Hero/Heroine character is observed by the audience and the two are not as interconnected. The character goes several ordeals and challenges dependant on the genre of the film. The separation of character and audience opens a wide door for Unrestricted Narration. This creates Suspense as the audience can see the Antagonist behind the corner, ready to attack the Protagonist, making the audience shout at screen "Don't do it! It shall be your last step!". Perhaps not so dramatised or with as much shouting but I think I got the point across.


Pure terror is hard to miss
Unfortunate acting is grateful it is not a marked criteria

True sadness acting is also grateful
John Watson meets Sherlock Holmes with the audience
High Frequency action scene follows Kirk through space!

Ben- Evaluation Question 4

  Strictly speaking, I believe our Thriller, Absence, to be a Crime Thriller. This puts it in the same Thriller sub-category as "Mr. Brooks" and "The Firm", Thriller films I looked at for my research at the start of the project. The difference between the two is that "Mr. Brooks" focuses on a serial killer avoiding capture and "The Firm" focuses on a young lawyer caught in the criminal web of a crooked law firm. Quite different, but still Crime-Thriller. 

  After the intro, Absence would focus Geoff trying to get revenge and eventually finding Susan. Wether she's alive or not, I can't decide. Because of Geoff profession (Police Detective), I know I would expect more than going door to door asking questions. Maybe a stakeout or a hostage situation resolved in a gunfight. Some action to break up to movie, but not so much that the film has an 18+ rating for blowing up a person's head with a shotgun on camera. With a rating of 15+ (maybe 16+) I put this movie to be for people:

  • Aged 16-30.
  • Appeal more to men but not drastically.
  • People looking for driving story and action.
  • Not for a specific social class.
  So with that demographic laid down, let see why I think so:

Age

  Age is an important factor for how many people can legally see the film. Furthermore, it can affect what they enjoy and maybe, most importantly, how much time and money they have for the film.
  Disney Pixar movies are very successful and are typically rate G (General Audiences) or PG (Parental Guidance suggested). Their target age group ends up being under the age of 13 but nearly all their movies are successful with many ages above that. They are aimed at children but you are never going to see a group of primary school kids on a day out to the cinema on their own. Their parents are going to be there too and Disney Pixar has understood this and made sure not to bore them repetitive and frustrating (Dora the Explorer) child friendly dialogue. However, not everyone is going to a be full blown Disney fanatic and they don't always want an animated movie with a heartfelt message at the end. They want real action! Something that will amaze them and leave them in awe! Something like "Interstellar" or "Gravity", both 12A. Going even further, "Reservoir Dogs" at 18 for containing 'Strong bloody violence, torture, strong language & sex references'. Why the first conversation in this movie has sex references. These ratings can act as quality check. The higher the rating, the more the creators were able to put into the film, and the more badass the film is going to be.
  A sixteen and over rating is a middle ground. Teenagers with large amount of expendable cash with working twenty and over adults all coming in to watch what has been compared to "Gone Girl" and "Before I Go to Sleep".
Fun for all ages
Tension becomes unbearable
You're left in awe

Gender

  Following stereotypes, Absence would a movie largely for men because of the gritty setting, plot and action that appeals to the 'hard man looking for thrills'. However, stereotypes are never true fact. Anyone can be in search of thrills in their movies as anyone - male or female - can get excited by a chase scene for an escaping suspected arsonist, for example. Social stigma can have members of either sex enjoy certain things that have been deemed appropriate for their sex. This may steer men more towards Absence and other movies like "Guardians of the Galaxy", "The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies" and "American Sniper" while women are steered more towards "Wild", "The Fault in Our Stars" and "Into the Woods". All movies chosen as if following stereotype of 'Manly man' and 'Girly girl'. Without these, I would believe the audience to be 50/50 between men and women. But even so, there are always people that do not confirm to such things and would watch whatever the hell they wanted.





Social Class

  I wrote that our Thriller, Absence, is not for any particular social class. A good movie is a good movie, if someone wants to watch it, they're going to watch it. It does not matter if they are a multi billion dollar family on vacation in Dubai, or a motor racing fan from Liverpool. They can both go watch whatever good movie they like so long as they pay their toll to the Hollywood Troll under the bridge.