I personally feel like that I’ve learnt quite a lot about
the technology which my group used to construct the thriller opening throughout
the whole production of it, for example editing, the actual cameras, lighting
and other pieces of equipment like the tripods. This was easy to learn with a
mix of lessons taught by people around who knew more than me in the first place
and trial and error. I believe that although the opening is not perfect, it
allowed a lot of these lessons to be taught.
I became more confident and able to use the camera more
efficiently because I had a larger role in being the cameraman. I do think this
has helped my ability in camerawork and has allowed me to learn a lot more than
I knew when operating a camera before this project. The actual technology was a
special camera which one of our group members was generous enough to allow us
to use so he could teach us how the use the actual piece of technology, as we
did the same the first time in the preliminary task. The first few shots that I
was in charge of shooting, I made sure that there were more than one take so if
one failed we could hopefully use another, I also had asked for other people’s
opinions on every shot that I was put in charge of, which helped to boost my
confidence. There was a focus pull which we shot, which ended up in the final product as we wished it to look like. We used focus to show that Geoff had been effected mentally by the situation after all this time, in our graphic match.
Something which I feel I learnt the most about was the
editing stage of the production. As a group, we spent a long time editing our
project, the sequence and the titles, this was a big learning curve and the
amount of time spent on this allowed us all to become more familiar with using
the editing software and the technology in general. Creating continuity and
aiding the sequence to flow smoothly was a big boost skill which was improved.
We came into some issues with making the sequence flow at one stage in
particular so we had to go and reshoot several shots to be placed in-between. I
think these re-shoots helped us to keep the attention of the audience and basically
not be so boring. To be more ambitious, we used a graphic match between two
locations of the character with the same expression, with the same composition
at different settings. I feel this was planned well and the technology allowed
us to complete this. We took a picture of the setup on our phones and recreated
it with the tripod and camera position being the same. There were no fancy transitions used but to
help show that the location had changed in the graphic match, the background
sound changes noticeably. But there were filters to show that there was a
flashback to a past event when the shots appeared to and from the present.
Another editing section was the titles. To do this we created a separate
project and worked on it, experimenting with different ideas until we came to
the conclusion that the fog on the black screen with the transition of the text
would suit our context.
Using technology was obviously an important part of the
whole thing for us. But to try and make the best thing we could, we tried to
perfect the sound with sound recorders and royalty free music websites. The sound recorders allowed us to take sound
produced at different times and locations and then add it into the project
later on in post-production. Although we tried to keep these away from the
shot, at one shot taken had a small recorder shown, so our placement of these
and vision of them on camera should be limited to none next time we use them,
and instead perhaps record asynchronous sound instead of recording it as it
happens on camera, adding it in later in post-production.

You need to vary the format more. You don't appear to have done a film or prezi, so the format is the same for all questions. You should seriously consider changing this, so that you get positive marks for using other formats as recommended. This question again needs more length, and precision. For eg, where you discuss camera work, this needs breaking down to actual techniques - at present it's rather generalised and so can't attract many marks.
ReplyDelete